SHOCKING: South & Midwest U.S. Storms, Tornadoes and Flooding Caused by NEXRAD + Power Plant Aerosols

April 29-30/14 - A convoluted weather system, whose moisture stretches for thousands of miles, is actively being influenced by NEXRAD stations across the continent. The moisture can be seen coming in from near the Gulf of Mexico, towards north eastern states, then curving back down, and finally curving back up into Alberta and Saskatchewan. It makes its way far north towards the Arctic. Surface analysis photos are provided at the end of this article. Cloud plumes can be seen originating from power plants in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, and North Carolina states. To learn more about power plant aerosols and their impact on climate and precipitation, click here.

What is also strange about this system is that there appears to be an intense low pressure zone that lies near the Davenport, IA (KDVN) NEXRAD site. We also see important satellite data being censored in the Western continent. Could this be due to the fact that moisture (see second photo in last section) is being diverted from central Baja California and Mexico into the southern states? We believe that power plant aerosols are also creating excessive moisture from ground, feeding the developing thunderstorm and rainfall that has flooded areas near the Gulf. This has all been documented in the video below. Pay close attention to how the NEXRAD sites (white dots) are actively shaping the developing weather systems:

In the satellite portion of the video here, take note of the cloud plumes originating in Louisiana and neighbouring states just east of it. There are some massive power plants in many of these areas. See the power plants map here. Regarding the cloud plumes, watch each state in the video one by one, in order to correlate the cloud formations with the information below.

We have listed power plants with large operating capacity in areas from where the plumes originate. We believe that these power plants are largely responsible for the massive cloud formations that dumped intense rain in some areas. See the accompanying legend to the right. Each energy plant below also has an operating capacity (in megawatts), which is important in determining the amount of aerosols that can be released into the sky. The energy plant names have been colour-coded for ease of referencing on the accompanying maps. Clicking on the underlined state (in the caption) will take you to a map of power plants for that State, in which each power plant can be selected and explored. 

Click on the maps below to enlarge. Once clicked, use the right and left arrows on your keyboard to navigate through photos. Pressing escape or the top right x will lead back to the article.

Louisiana - Top left to bottom right - Big Cajun 2 Coal Plant (1743 MW) and River Bend Nuclear Plant (975 MW); Waterford 3 Nuclear Plant (1159 MW), Little Gypsy (1159), and Taft Cogeneration Facility (790); Nine Mile Point (1365 MW); Michoud (705 MW). Mostly owned by Entergy Louisiana Inc.

Mississippi - Left to right - Jack Watson Coal Plant (998 MW); Victor J Daniel Jr Coal Plant (1992 MW). Owned by Mississippi Power Co.

Alabama - Top left to bottom right: Gorgas Coal Plant (1241 MW), James H Miller Jr Coal Plant (2675 MW), E C Gaston Coal Plant (1878 MW), Greene County (1237 MW), Tenaska Lindsay Hill (845 MW), Barry Coal Plant (2574 MW). Owned by Alabama Power Co.

Florida - Top to bottom: St Johns River Power Park Coal Plant (1252 MW), Seminole Coal Plant (1363 MW), Crystal River Coal Plant (3161 MW), Stanton Energy Coal Plant (1181 MW).

North Carolina - Left to right: Sherwood H Smith Jr Energy Complex (1922 MW), Harris Nuclear Plant (928 MW), Wayne County (863 MW). Mostly owned by Progress Energy Carolinas Inc.

Is it a coincidence that cloud plumes were seen on satellite originating from Louisiana state, which ranks second in the U.S. for energy consumption per capita? 

Learn more about power plant exhaust-induced cloud formations here.

Surface analysis and satellite images are provided below. Click on the images to enlarge:

Related Links:

Geoengineering: Florida Flood 04-30-14

NEXRAD Climate Engineering using Electromagnetism - U.S. - April 26/14

Multiple Satellite Views -- Late April 2014 Tornado Outbreak

The climate penalty for clean fossil fuel combustion (Research Paper)

Power plant exhaust-induced cloud formations

HD Timelapse: Convective rain shower triggered by power plant 

Weather Patents Prove Control of Storm Systems

Above: An illustration of Patent# 2881335

We present information from the U.S. Patent Office for weather patent # 2881335, which dates back to 1959, entitled "GENERATION OF ELECTRICAL FIELDS". This is one of many weather patents in this field. Although this patent is probably quite outdated, we would imagine that it has been updated with the most recent technology involving electromagnetism methods. This should land as proof that the "Doppler anomalies" with tapering plume-shaped storms that we are seeing being generated near the centre of Doppler centres are man-made. This document even mentions the "plumes" by name, the super-charging of storms, and being able to steer storms using charged particles and electromagnetism. Full text is not available for this patent on-line, and may have been removed. We provide some snippets from the patent:

This invention relates to the conversion of mechanical energy into electrical energy and

more particularly to a regenerative system for charging bodies or clouds. It is desirable in many processes to be able to control the charge on a stream or body of discrete particles such as fine liquid droplets, aerosols, dust particles, etc...

Above: Perhaps the spraying of
aerosol has several uses?

 Likewise depositing similar charges on a cloud or stream of aerosols or dust particles, for example, offers the possibility of directing the flow of such particles by means of electrical attraction to a target.

It is a further object to provide a method whereby the aqueous particles of cumulus clouds may be charged rapidly with a total charge sufficient to induce lightning and a subsequent rain storm. 

In Fig. 3 there is shown a modification of the process of this invention as it may be applied to controlling the charges on particles making up clouds. Thus, cloud plumes ... are comparable to electrodes ... An extremely high-voltage would be required in order to ionize the surrounding air constituents and particles contained in the air in order to enable them to deposit their charges on the cloud particles.

Above: Cloud ionizer umbrella
at Denver International Airport

The fast negative ions produced in the air by reason of discharge by Point 25 are then drawn by plate 30 through the smoke or cloud stream as it emerges from source 23, where these ions become attached to the cloud particles. The movement of the air then carries these charged cloud ‘Particles, such as 27, out into the plume 21 away from plate 30.

The accumulation of negative charges in the top of cloud plume 21 causes point 24 to give point discharge and to produce a stream of fast-moving positive ions which become attached to the ‘cloud particles in plume 20 as they emerge in the cloud stream from source 22. The accumulation of positive charges in cloud plume 20 then becomes sufficient to maintain point discharge from point 25. When this occurs, the arrangement is self-exciting, and high voltage need no longer be applied to plate 30.

In the case of the cloud plumes of Fig.3, the fine cloud droplets or particles are so small that their movement is determined by the movement of the environmental air more than by the electric field as in the arrangement illustrated in Fig.1. Thus, the force of the air (or other gas coming from sources 22 and 23 which may be natural air currents) carries the particles with it to build up the cloud plumes 20 and 21 shown.

Above: Artificial ion generation

Such methods of controlling cloud formations may be applicable to a number of various problems. First, for example, there is the application of this method of particle charging to the creation and control of thunderstorms. When the charges in clouds 20 and 21 become great enough to create a sufficiently intense field between them, there will be lightning across the clouds and a subsequent rainstorm.

Industrial applications of this method of charging a cloud of particles include such uses as the removal of particles from a fluid stream, the atomization of liquids, and the deposition of finely divided particles on areas (ie. aircraft spraying of aerosols) ...

We realize that this patent intends to make use of ionization methods to control weather, and there has been a wealth of research done on artificial atmospheric ionization. One such article which discusses this is entitled, ARTIFICIAL ATMOSPHERIC IONIZATION: A Potential Window for Weather Modification. It can also be accessed on-line. A video regarding how electricity is being used to produce precipitation can be viewed here.

Above: Controlling weather systems. Sound familiar?

Perhaps this type of technology can help explain why we are seeing numerous thunderstorms suddenly appear near airports, such as this one (below) that was seen next to Vulcan Airport in Alberta. We are finding such anomalous storms appear to be generated or super-charged in the same specific areas over and over again. Another interesting phenomenon worth reading is rain fade, keeping in mind that, if rain affects microwave frequency, how does microwave frequency affect rain.

Above: Doppler radar for Strathmore, AB, showing a tapering storm appearing near Vulcan Airport (CFX6)

Above: Next to Vulcan Airport, AB. We know that ionizers are being used at airports, however, we are unsure what this device is used for.

Above: Location of device near Vulcan Airport, AB

There is also great article entitled, Corona ion induced atmospheric potential gradient perturbations near high voltage power lines, which discusses how high voltage power lines can be strong enough to ionize the air and affect weather conditions, as well as their adverse health effects to humans. The article can be read here. The only thing this article does not take into consideration for its studies is how electromagnetic activity emitted from transmitter antennas (telephone towers, etc), airports, and Doppler stations (ie. NEXRAD) can affect these ions. Read more about the Doppler Effect here. We provide some snippets from the article about corona ions:

The Earth’s atmosphere is slightly conducting due to the presence of small ions created by ionising radiation, such as airborne and terrestrial radioactivity and cosmic rays. Once created, an ion will attract water molecules to form a small cluster ion w 1 nm in size. Though many remain as small ions, some either recombine with a small ion of opposite polarity or attach to an aerosol altering its charge (Harrison and Carslaw, 2003). There are also anthropogenic sources of ions; for example from traffic (Israelsson and Lelwala, 1999), industrial activity (Jones and Jennings, 1977; Laurent and Peyrous, 1979) or from high voltage (HV) power lines (Chalmers, 1952; Mühleisen, 1953; Jayaratne et al., 2008). 

 [Insert: What is not mentioned above as a source of ions is the massive spraying of nano-sized metallic particles into our atmosphere during Geoengineering aerosol operations. For example, read or search U.S. Patent #5003186, Patent #3813875, Patent #3899144, Patent #4362271, Patent #4412654, Patent #4684063 ... the list goes on]

The alternating electric field near to a high voltage (HV) power cable can be strong enough to ionise the air, creating corona ions. Ions are created by the process of corona avalanching, where electrons are accelerated towards or away from the cable colliding with molecules and creating further ion electron pairs. The field is stronger when there is damage to, or protrusions (such as dirt or water droplets) on the line, so more ions are produced (Mombello et al., 2001).

Above: Take note of how the HAARP system works, as we believe there is a direct correlation with weather modification. The transmitter pictured to the far right is precisely what NEXRAD / Doppler devices are, along with numerous transmitter antennas equipped and electromagnetically-active throughout the country. HAARP is used to study the alteration of the atmosphere, and there are weather patents that link this connection. The technology of HAARP is now being used at a local level, in conjunction with our weather system technology. 

Perhaps we have an answer for these strange amounts of condensation suddenly appearing out of nowhere on our satellite images. And it provides also an answer to the tapering plume-shaped storm systems we are seeing being generated in close proximity to NEXRAD / Doppler stations around the country. The question we must answer ourselves: how is the use of this technology affecting ground water and moisture content in local areas, especially for drought-developing conditions? Should we really trust in whose hands this technology lies, artificially diverting and misplacing moisture to areas that it would otherwise not move? Should we really mess with Mother Nature, by depleting one area of moisture for another, thereby disturbing the natural water cycle and moisture patterns?

Above: Let's keep our natural ecosystems and environment natural

Above: NEXRAD-induced storms - Original image here. The latest inventions in  weather modification using electromagnetism methods listed in patents. Ask a meteorologist if it is normal to have these tapering plume-shaped cloud systems originate from near the centre of doppler / NEXRAD stations, being passed from one to another. Are these storms caused by global warming or storms caused by geoengineering? 

Above: Original image here. Although he could have done it himself, the Bethune (near Regina) Doppler station would personally like to thank Glasgow, MT and Minot, ND Doppler stations for the minor support in generating this tapered plume-shaped storm system.

Above: Original image here. North/South Dakota plume-shaped storms - NEXRAD stations connecting the dots for us.

Electromagnetic-Driven Storms & Radar Anomalies for mid-July

What follows is a list of recent activity of storms and radar anomalies seen in parts of Canada and the United States (South Dakota / North Dakota). From the Prairies to Ontario, with neighbouring NEXRAD stations in the United States, we have analysed satellite and radar data to see where these strange tapering storms are coming from. Click on an image to enlarge it for more details. 

Below: Toronto, Ontario gets hit with a hard storm, and tornado warnings were issued in the area. Look at where this NEXRAD storm starts and ends. We highly doubt that the media will not mention a word about where this storm precisely originated from in the States.

Below: A photograph captured by a resident of Toronto, showing the city's sky before the storm hit.

Below: If  NEXRAD stations could talk, perhaps they could explain to us where all these tapering storms are coming from?

Below: NEXRAD-induced storms: The latest inventions in weather modification using electromagnetism methods listed in patents that aren't new. Ask a meteorologist if it is normal to have these tapering, plume-shaped cloud systems originate from near the centre of these Doppler / NEXRAD stations, being passed from one to another. Are these storms caused by  global warming or storms caused by geoengineering. What do you think?

Below: Although he could have done it himself, the Bethune (near Regina) Doppler station would personally like to thank Glasgow, MT and Minot, ND Doppler stations for their minor support in generating this tapered storm system.

Below: Prairie radar data. This Doppler-driven storm was moving south east in the top two frames, then suddenly at 10:00 UTC in the third frame, data becomes "missing" for the Bethune (Saskatoon) station. After this missing data frame, we suddenly see the storm immediately halt in going south, and it deviates to go directly east. A little strange, wouldn't you say?

Below: These Prairie storms seem to line up and orient themselves so well with the Doppler stations. There is no way electromagnetic forces could influence moisture, or is there?

Below: If storms could talk, what do you think they would say? This one may be using charades to tell us something, as its moisture tapers and points towards the Bethune, SK Doppler station.

Below: Electromagnetic forces can't influence storms, or can they? Read the weather modification patents to find out more. Interestingly, this storm is travelling south east , and we literally see a wave of ripples going south, directly through the centre of the Doppler radar. These cloud ripples appear to hold very little moisture, and are not dense like other parts of the storm system. It almost reminds us of the Doppler waves seen in clouds at times. Is this a signature of the Doppler station being put to use?

Below: North Dakota and South Dakota storms. NEXRAD stations are connecting the dots for us. Can you connect the rest?

Below: Dryden, Woodlands, Winnipeg and other parts of Manitoba would like to thank Canada Doppler stations and North Dakota / South Dakota NEXRAD stations for bringing more storms and rain to their areas. Is geoengineering messing with our water cycle?

Below: Sit back, relax, and let the Doppler stations connect the dots. The top image shows Prairie radar stations pulsing electromagnetic frequency. The bottom image is Doppler stations connecting the dots for us.