Tuesday, 30 June 2015

Anticyclone Hovers Over Utah NEXRAD Tower For 2 Days!

A high pressure zone appears just south west of Utah, moves its way   towards Cedar City, UT (KICX Nexrad tower), and then heads north towards Salt Lake City, UT (KMTX Nexrad tower). The high pressure zone hovers over the KMTX NEXRAD tower for more than 2 days, creating an anticyclone weather system and influencing the jet stream! It looks KMTX has a new friend...


It looks like Salt Lake City's KMTX NEXRAD Tower has a new friend...

Related Information:

Certain types of radar, especially C-Band radar, can weaken or strengthen a tornado. But this can also depend on atmospheric conditions, radar emission strength, cyclone strength, etc. 

I do believe that much of the recent tornadoes in the past have been artificially created, in an attempt to use weather weapons by military in the near future. They are testing out this type of technology. DutchSinse has done some great documentation and studies regarding these man-made tornadoes:


Also, there is a document entitled, Weather as a Force Multiplier Owning the Weather in 2025, which discusses the military use of weather:

9 comments:

  1. So are you telling me that the radar is being used to physically force or artificially create an anticyclone?
    If so,
    could this be used to neutralize destructive tornadoes
    also
    are the rashes of destructive tornadoes being artfically created
    or both

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, precisely - Certain types of radar, especially C Band can weaken or strengthen a tornado. But this can also depend on atmospheric conditions, radar emission strength, cyclone strength, etc.

    I do believe that much of the recent tornadoes in the past 20 or so years have been artificially created, in an attempt to use weather weapons by military in the near future. They are testing out this type of technology.

    DutchSinse has done some great documentation and studies regarding these man-made tornadoes:

    http://dutchsinse.com/4022015-man-made-tornadoes-new-york-nexrad-radar-induces-vortex-rotation-haarp-ring/

    Also, there is a document entitled, Weather as a Force Multiplier Owning the Weather in 2025" which discusses military use of weather:

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-ultimate-weapon-of-mass-destruction-owning-the-weather-for-military-use-2/5306386

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Here is another real example
      http://www.fondriest.com/news/nasa-airborne-snow-observatory-ensures-wests-water-data-grows-water-demand.htm

      of where they're at using satellites and math models to try and forecast how to force snow pack. The finer the resolution theoretically the more accurate the result without flooding people.

      I can see doing it on a small scale inside a valley for farmers needing water but the large scale over mountain ranges and plains ...

      Canmore snowpack upstream of Calgary if generated by Vernon doppler is an example of not getting it right because of the mountain ranges and prairie plain

      Delete
  3. Thank you for replying so quickly.

    We had a 4.3 to 4.8 earthquake last night.

    The same western technologies can be used for many other purposes including anticipating earthquakes for safeguarding people.

    Digging further, the best warning N. American scientists can give civilians in tornado alley is about 45 minutes assuming average tornado moves 100 miles per hour.

    However Russia has patented 1 to 3 day warnings for earthquakes. Which means they can give such warnings for tornadoes as well.

    This means N American technology is either way behind in protecting civilians from tornadoes, earthquakes, floods etc. or they don't want to admit they're either behind or ahead of the Russian technology.

    I can see where you would only need one doppler station to divert a vortex or create a vortex. If there were no storms approaching a vortex could be created with 2 or 3 stations.

    One high resolution antenna system I saw yesterday nested s simple antenna inside a pentagon antenna for higher resolution. Intended for both finer resolution detection and response.

    The same physics appear already to be applied both inside our oceans and atmosphere. Manipulation of two dynamic flow systems on top of ocean and land floor topographies and temperature layers and temperature layers.

    Extremely difficult to forecast results at a fine scale resulting in the Calgary flooding you first posted about.

    However water flows in continental rivers flowing from mountain headwaters are heavily overdrawn so extra snow pack generation would be intended to help with summer draw downs not just to benefit skiers and hydroelectricity.

    Calibrating such automated forcing would be extremely difficult until they get much higher resolution forecasting models.

    The US nexrad is combing polarized doppler with acoustics along tornado alley which also coincides with a massive seismic fault. It is a mobile experimental system with a 10 to 20 mile grid size network but the 10 mile resolution again will only provide a 45 minute warning at best.

    Take a look at
    http://hydro.washington.edu/forecast/monitor_west/index.shtml

    The American Geophysical Union just published
    Legacy and Perspectives of for the Science of Hydrology
    (for 1965 to 2015) which covers a lot of the grid based research.

    It is a free publication you can download to a drop box
    but I can find work that is a lot farther ahead than that

    The research as usual is doubled edged as usual.

    Last night on Coast to Coast radio (you can google their shows) they had on a long in tooth fusion energy physicist who just confirmed Mars was wiped out by two in atmopshere manmade nuclear bombs 250,000 to 500,000 years ago. The Mars atmosphere is full of a krypton and xenon, both derivates of manmade nuclear bombs. NASA knew since 1976.

    The physicist said in a few years fusion electrical power should be working and will take the pressure of say hydro electrical generated power which would take the pressure of forced snow pack creation from the nexrad applications. I hope the fellow was correct.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great job on covering these weather warfare attacks. It's unbelievable how the general public has no idea this is going on around the world on a daily basis.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Joseph
    You might be interested in the following website
    http://www.atmos.washington.edu/cliff/Langleyradar.html

    It appears there will be a tower a each coastline along the US pacific coastal state, near the previous WWII coastal radar sites. Suggests both for weather and security

    I don't like these towers being located at ski resorts with such high operating frequencies even if they only scan a swath every 6 minutes.

    The guys working on DEW lines and weather ships used to be told to stay away from the microwave radar horns when they were running, because of health hazards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for sharing this crucial information!

      Delete
  6. Joseph here is another interesting scientific paper
    The title says it is about warning about urban flooding
    However, when I look at all the sensors there is another purpose. I feel sorry for the residents being exposed to such a blanket of radars. It is also very highly ground sensored so they are really determined to see if they can get an accurate model.

    Methodology
    First, the scientists and engineers are monitoring a specific water shed

    Their goal is to statisitcally connect or reliably calibrate the relationship between the incoming weather and the ground measurements in the watershed. The same as was done when they preplanned years in advance then micromanaged the snowpack at the Olympic winter games in Whistler BC in 2010 and previously in the Utah winter Olympics where they set up the first micromanagement of snow pack using a micronetwork of monitors. Very similar to the new monitoring being done above Canmore after the Calgary flood. Historically, a geologist said there had been massive flooding in the same Canmore region about 100 years ago, there is a scientific paper on that but I don't have it handy right now.

    Once they can calibrate the model of the watershed in the Texas paper than they may use the radars to precisely manipulate how much rain they can create or steer into that watershed without causing flooding. If it is low lying rolling area such as the flooding between Calgary and Winnipeg a few years ago they will be looking at this Texas model as being useful in the Canadian prairies for generating rain for crops without flooding cities.

    Here is the paper

    http://www.meteo.fr/cic/meetings/2012/ERAD/extended_abs/QPE_060_ext_abs.pdf

    Also Environment Canada specifically has been involved a long time hail mitigation for prairie farmers for minimizing insurance claims.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great paper! I will be looking into this. Also you mentioned hail mitigation - that is also another compelling topic. Check out these articles:

      http://weatherpeace.blogspot.ca/2013/08/silver-iodide-case-against-cloud-seeding.html

      http://weatherpeace.blogspot.ca/2013/09/got-hail-weather-patent-discussing.html

      http://weatherpeace.blogspot.ca/2013/07/wichita-kansas-hail-storm-weather.html

      Delete