W.Canada: Aerosols + Radar Preparing Us For Snow / Precipitation

Oct 25-26/13 - Moisture / clouds adhering to the circular shape of the radar circumference. How do electromagnetic forces emitted from radar sites affect our weather? During Environment Canada's forecast of rain/snow occurring, take note of what is happening "around" our radar sites.The sky photos below are taken from Calgary, AB, and clearly show the heavy aerosols being deployed in our skies prior to this forecast of snow/rain. 

Also See:

http://weatherpeace.blogspot.ca/2013/10/snow-forecast-aerosols-nexrad.html

Is Radioactive-Tainted Moisture Being Brought to N.America by Climate Engineers?

Oct 10/13 - Where are climate engineers and military-owned jets being ordered to spray their moisture-collecting aerosols? It appears that they are spraying across the Pacific, from near Japan's (Fukushima) nuclear-contaminated waters, creating a large geo-engineered weather front that will sweep across N.America. Perhaps this is the reason why Environment Canada and other agencies have censored their satellite images, which is nothing new. Are these intentionally-generated Pacific weather fronts bringing us radioactive rain? The Bay Citizen reports:

Rain falling on the United States contains radioactive material from Japan at levels that exceed federal safety thresholds. 

Federal officials on Tuesday urged calm in the wake of the discovery of iodine-131, which blew across the Pacific Ocean from the stricken Fukushima nuclear power plant, in rainwater. 

The tests that detected the radioactive material were conducted by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and by nuclear power plant operators in Pennsylvania.

Update: New York Post, Dec. 22, 2013: Navy sailor Lindsay Cooper knew something was wrong when billows of metallic-tasting snow began drifting over USS Ronald Reagan. [...] she and scores of crewmates watched a sudden storm blow toward them from the tsunami-torn coast of Fukushima, Japan. The snow was caused by the freezing Pacific air mixing with a plume of radioactive steam [...] Senior Chief Michael Sebourn, a radiation-decontamination officer, was assigned to test the aircraft carrier for radiation. The levels were incredibly dangerous and at one point, the radiation in the air measured 300 times higher than what was considered safe, Sebourn told The Post.

Climate Engineering is Responsible for Fires, Droughts, and Death

There are two main issues at hand: our moisture / clouds being diverted through EM technology and aerosols, and the destruction of our ozone layer due to climate engineering aerosols. Please read more about the ozone issue here.

The issue of moisture diversion has become progressively worse, as the Pacific coast moisture and clouds are diverted to other areas in the U.S., causing a great depletion of rainfall and moisture in the Western states. More can be read about this here, in the case of Mexico. We have also documented the types of technology that are largely responsible for this here.

Electric Rain-making Technology: Blessing or Curse for Mexico and U.S.

We present an article from the IEEE Spectrum (April 1, 2004) :

From at least the early 1940s to the end of the 20th century, it always rained more in the state of Jalisco, in central Mexico, than in its neighbor Aguascalientes. But in 2000, on a patch of parched pasture in Aguascalientes, workers from Mexico City-based Electrificación Local de la Atmósfera Terrestre SA (ELAT) erected a peculiar field of interconnected metal poles and wires somewhat resembling the skeleton of a carnival tent. Since then, about as much rain has fallen on the plains of Aguascalientes as on its more lush neighbor. 

The brainchild of a fractious group of Russian émigrés, the poles and wires are in fact a network of conductors meant to ionize the air. If the technique is done properly, the thinking goes, the natural current between the earth and the ionosphere is amplified, leading--through a mechanism that is not fully understood--to rainfall. There are now 17 such installations in six states in Mexico, and in January, federal government agencies decided to back construction and operation of 19 more by 2006, potentially altering the weather in much of parched north and central Mexico. Meanwhile, by May, ELAT's competitor Earthwise Technologies Inc., of Mexico City and Dallas, could win the right to establish ionization stations in southwest Texas's water-starved Webb County, which would make it the first such installation in the United States.

There are many questions that remain. Where is all this moisture being diverted to? Why is there still drought, as we will later see? Which areas will be depleted and which areas will receive the rain? Is this technology really helping drought, or is it making matters worse? What does this mean for the natural water cycle, and how is it affected? How does this artificial ionization affect the ground water and moisture (in air content) that lurk in these areas, forcing this moisture to be used up? How does this affect birds and living organisms? The article above (dated 2004) spoke about Jalisco known for receiving more rain, and now over 10 years later we are told by sources in Mexico that water levels are falling in Jalisco:

The Chapala Lake’s water levels dropped by 22 centimeters (8.6 inches) in March, four times the drop in the same month last year, according to the National Water Commission (Conagua). During a recent drought, the lake lost 34 billion cubic feet of water. Last year, northern and central Mexican states suffered the worst drought the country has seen for 80 years. Conagua said in a statement that the lake currently holds about 3.3 billion cubic meters (116.5 million cubic feet) of water, about 41.5 percent of its capacity. 

More recently, from this source:

Some parts of northern Mexico have been experiencing a severe drought for almost three years. The worst affected states are Chihuahua, Nuevo León, Coahuila, Durango, Zacatecas, Tamaulipas, San Luis Potosí, together with parts of Querétaro, Aguascalientes, Sinaloa and Sonora. [Also note how many of these northern affected states are bordering near Texas]

As this year’s rainy season begins in central Mexico, dozens of reservoirs are at critically low levels. Reservoirs in Coahuila average only 10% of their capacity, only slightly better than those in San Luis Potosí (12%). Even the populous state of Jalisco faces problems; its reservoirs are at 27% of capacity.

The drought has already caused significant losses to farmers. Livestock owners in northern Mexico have culled herds and are having to buy in supplies of water to top up their private wells. Rainfall so far in 2013 has been well below long-term averages in central and northern Mexico, which may limit the region’s productivity of rain-fed agriculture (mostly wheat, corn, sorghum and other fodder crops).

To read more about weather patents involving the control of moisture, click here. During our continuing research, we have seen numerous occasions on satellite animation showing moisture in Mexico being diverted into the States, using NEXRAD and electromagnetic-related technology. A good example of this can be seen here.

Above: Is the NAVSPASUR (Naval Space Surveillance) system in Gila River, AZ being actively used? If so, what implications do these "space fence" transmitters (216.97 MHz) have on the atmosphere?

Above: Original image here. Deja vu -- It looks like Kansas is being fed more rain and storms to drought-stricken areas, in exchange for moisture diverted from other areas, such as drought-struck Mexico and south California's tropospheric river. This is all done with the help of NEXRAD and other devices used for Geoengineering. We see this Kansas storm being generated again-and-again, but why aren't officials discussing this large-scale weather modification program in the U.S.? Are they worried the public might revolt if they know what their tax dollars are being used for? How many times will it take for them to divert Mother Nature's water cycle to get it right? Perhaps fighting a drought is like putting out a fire with water, except with a little too much water to cause flooding.

Above: Let's pray for our Mexican brothers and sisters. It appears that NEXRAD stations bordering northern Mexico are diverting moisture north into the States to fuel U.S. storms for political enjoyment. This is all done using the tropospheric rivers. Many northern states in Mexico have been experiencing severe droughts as a result of this electromagnetic tampering with the atmosphere, and their reservoirs (drinking water) are at critical levels. If you don't believe EM-related technology can divert moisture in the air, think again. U.S. Patent Office for weather patent # 2881335, which dates back to 1959, entitled "GENERATION OF ELECTRICAL FIELDS" speaks about this in great detail.

Above: Original image here. U.S. Drought Mitigation - Depleting one area of rain for another. Arizona , Texas, and New Mexico NEXRAD stations stealing moisture from northern Mexico and using it to feed storm systems in the central States.

Above: Original image here. It looks like Texas rainfall diversion is being used elsewhere. Texas has openly spoke about weather modification, so why not others? Although Texas has been using weather modification for decades now, the drought problem still persists. There are some very powerful NEXRAD devices in Texas, which help super-charge storms using ionization and electromagnetism methods.

Above: It would have been interesting to see what the Tuscan, AZ NEXRAD (KEMX) station was up to during this time, as this cloud appears to be generated directly above the Doppler facility

Above: A weather front being stretched all the way from Mexico diagonally into the U.S. and Canada

Above: After watching numerous radar / satellite animations, it appears that NEXRAD / Doppler stations are capable of connecting these storms where they wouldn't normally connect

Related Articles:

Moisture being driven from Gulf of Mexico into U.S. and Canada

Mexico's stolen moisture driven into the States and Canada
The Doppler Effect: Are radars affecting the weather?
Bizarre Chemtrail Spraying over the Gulf of Mexico Captured via Satellite ImageAerosol Dumps in Gulf of Mexico and Chemtrails Over Florida, Feb 20-22

The Case Against Cloud-Seeding

Before reading this post, it is important that one understands the concept and methods used for ice-nucleation, which can be read here. As we know, Silver iodide is used to induce rain, either sprayed into the sky by aircraft or from ground. The toxic acute health effects of Silver iodide have been noted, however much research is lacking regarding chronic health effects and many others. The Material Data Safety Sheet for Silver iodide can be read here. We provide an excerpt from this article:

According to Medscape.com, prolonged exposure can cause discoloration of the hands. While the yellow white film-processing chemical would sometimes leave the skin a little yellow or orange, the lasting result was often a grey ashy color staining their hands. This discoloration is a side-effect of the disorder, agyria.

Argyria is classified as a skin condition though it also can potentially affect mucous membranes. Basically, the silver particles impregnate the skin and leaving residue in mucous membranes. Studies conclude that an unknown amount of silver can cause this condition because the rate at which it affects individuals varies so much. But this is, again, testing contact with the skin, not on the inhalation of silver iodide.

Putting aside human health, there are many controversies still surrounding the idea of cloud-seeding, as it is not based entirely on sound science, as discussed in this article:

There are many, many unscrupulous people in the field of weather modification who up until now have promoted some methods without any proper scientific evidence. Developing countries are particularly at risk here," says Siems. The technique ''remains controversial, especially because in the early days unrealistic claims were made about its success'', says Johannes Verlinde, associate professor of meteorology at US-based Pennsylvania State University. Another reason for the controversy, he says, is that no two clouds are alike, making it difficult to compare clouds to prove it really works.

 Another article for Australia makes similar claims, titled "Scientist admits proof lacking after $160k cloud-seed trial." The Gazette for Colorado Springs states:

Colorado State University climate researcher Bill Cotton conducted one cloud-seeding study five years ago. A $100,000 grant to study weather modification in Colorado produced no definitive results. He said there is a “good chance” cloud seeding boosts snowfall, adding that to have so much spending on it without conclusive research is “kind of sad.” “It’s not a very effective way to do science,” he said. 

Silver iodide is also used for hail mitigation methods. We believe the media isn't telling us the real science behind Silver iodide "hail suppression" and weather patents. Knowing that Silver iodide cloud-seeding is used for inducing ice-nucleation into the sky, we believe instead of getting small hail pellets in a larger general area of the city, we instead get bigger hail pellets to come down instantaneously (with heavy shorter-duration rain). This would mean affecting a smaller area, but with more severity. We present snippets from an article which share these views, the Mountain View Gazette (June 28, 2011), written by Sylvia Cole, with emphasis added in square brackets:

There have already been 80 hours of work logged by pilots of Weather Modification Inc., based out of the Old-Didsbury Airport, this month alone.  

[This leaves us wondering if there were individuals cloud-seeding prior to the June flood in Alberta (2013), perhaps trying a little too hard to prevent hail?]

The company, sponsored by Alberta Severe Weather Management Society (ASWMS), a group of insurance companies that privately funds cloud-seeding in the area, spent 11 of the first 21 days of June shooting silver iodide in the clouds as a way to shrink ice stones and reduce property damage, said Terry Krauss, PhD in meteorology and program director for the ASWMS.

 [Let's hear it from the eye-witnesses]

“We can see from our house when they fly over and we can see their tanks. I saw them two times (last) year and that was the two times we saw hail,” said Wendy Schroeder, who

lives west of Sundre and noticed it for the first time last season. She said the first time she saw the planes go by was July 8 and “within 35 minutes we were pounded. It was an immediate drop of the hail,” she said.

Schroeder said the hail pounded down for seven minutes with big gusts of wind that flooded into her house where the windows weren’t sealed. “In seven minutes we had two inches (of rain) and there was no grass.” She said a couple of days later the same thing happened. “The timing of this is highly suspicious and can’t be ignored.”

Schroeder said she’s only seen the seeding planes once this year and while there wasn’t any hail that followed, she noticed a yellow film left on grass and on her vehicles that she said happens every time a plane goes by and rain or hail follows. She believes the iodide is toxic and bad for livestock, plants and humans. [She is definitely not alone in this belief]

Above: Hail received in Lethbridge, AB on July 6/13

"Alberta Agriculture funded a five-year study from 1974 to 1978 called the Alberta Hail Project. The project, similar to the one funded today by ASWMA, seeded all potential hail clouds for five years. The project was continued until 1985 when it was stopped because of “inconclusive scientific data,” said Cam Hantiuk, media relations for the premier’s office."

The lack of provincial regulation worries Louis Bauman, south of Sundre, who’s been following cloud seeding since the government’s involvement in the 1970s.

His brother Joseph, who has since passed away, fought with the government back in the late ’70s and early ’80s to stop the project. He said it wasn’t right that the government was meddling with the natural course of weather and said such activities were devastating for agriculture, livestock farming and recreation.

“Is it lawful in Alberta to change the natural course of the weather by physical and chemical intervention to produce artificially positive rain and hail storm in one part in order to prevent contingent rain and hail in another?” he wrote in an affidavit to the Red Deer Provincial Court in 1984."

“Something isn’t quite right; something is going on,” Hofer told the Gazette last year. He’s lived in the Sundre area for the last 50 years and said he was hired to work in Penhold during the ’70s when the Alberta Hail Project was in full force. 

Hofer said he was responsible for picking up hailstones to see if there had been any change in the size from the silver iodine. “We quit with it because it didn’t accomplish nothing. You can’t control nature. Cloud-seeding is just some fancy name for creating an electrical storm,” he said. He believes that the seeding only suppresses a storm until eventually it needs to be released. He used the example of a hailstorm on Aug. 2, 2009 that devastated the area. “It builds up and it builds up … until it breaks loose and gets worse.”

The cloud-seeding project with a $2 million annual budget is funded by more than 20 of Alberta’s top insurance firms that represent 90 per cent of all insured companies, said Krauss.

“Maybe the seeding will help Olds and Calgary by pre-emptying the clouds onto us, but what sort of reasoning is that, and how fair could that be?” asked Schroeder in a letter to the editor last year.

Above: July 6/13 - Alberta hailstorm leaving an unusual trail of hail, appearing as a deposited line. Are these the remnants of an aircraft cloud-seeding operation, during its linear flight of Silver iodide dispersing? Could this be what Hofer, Schroeder, and Bauman were referring to? View the image below for a possible answer.

Popular Science, March 1950 Edition, reads: "Punctured Cloud . . . Here's how a man-made hole in a cloud looks from topside, 15,000 feet up. The racetrack-shaped opening, 20 miles long on the sides, five miles across on the ends, was formed by seeding a stratus cloud with dry ice. The ice acts as a trigger on the supercooled water droplets in the cloud. They condense into snow or sleet, fall out of the cloud and, bingo, there's a hole. The cloud-busting is part of Project Cirrus, a joint research program of the Army Signal Corps and the Office of Naval Research. Des. Irving Langmuir and Vincent J. Schnefer, of General Electric, who originated the seeding technique, insist it can make rain. The Army and Navy, interested in military applications, just won't say. 

Above: Cloud Nucleating Generator (CNG) - A propane flame is used to vaporize the seeding solution, which is composed of silver iodide mixed in acetone. The vaporized silver iodide then re-crystallizes in the cold air, forming millions of tiny particles which are intended to serve as ice nuclei. Read more here.

Above: The science of cloud-seeding. We realize that it is not this simplistic, now is it?

In an article by Ronald B. Standler, under a sub-section titled, Langmuir's cloud seeding in New Mexico, we are told:

The General Electric / U.S. Military research project released AgI and dry ice in the vicinity of Albuquerque, NM during October 1948 and July 1949. Langmuir initially claimed that this release caused rain all over the state of New Mexico and possibly in Kansas.

Langmuir's group continued to release AgI in New Mexico between November 1949 and July 1951. Langmuir claimed that the release of AgI modified the weather, not only in the state of New Mexico, but also more than 1000 kilometers downwind. 

The release of AgI "was discontinued in July, 1951 during the great floods in Kansas and adjacent states." (Byers, 1974, p. 20) This flood was no ordinary flood: the 13 July 1951 flood at Kansas City was described as "the most devastating flood in the nation's history"; 17 people died as a direct result of that flood, despite weather forecasts and warnings. (Alexander, 1951) It is still unknown what effect, if any, the AgI release in New Mexico had on rain and floods in Kansas. As discussed below, perhaps the more interesting lesson is not one of science, but ethics: Langmuir sincerely believed that AgI release was modifying weather at long distances from the point of release, yet he continued to engage in such weather modification for two years, despite the possibility of harm from such modification, and despite the lack of consent by affected people. 

Also See:

History and Problems in Weather Modification

Weather Patents Prove Control of Storm Systems

Above: An illustration of Patent# 2881335

We present information from the U.S. Patent Office for weather patent # 2881335, which dates back to 1959, entitled "GENERATION OF ELECTRICAL FIELDS". This is one of many weather patents in this field. Although this patent is probably quite outdated, we would imagine that it has been updated with the most recent technology involving electromagnetism methods. This should land as proof that the "Doppler anomalies" with tapering plume-shaped storms that we are seeing being generated near the centre of Doppler centres are man-made. This document even mentions the "plumes" by name, the super-charging of storms, and being able to steer storms using charged particles and electromagnetism. Full text is not available for this patent on-line, and may have been removed. We provide some snippets from the patent:

This invention relates to the conversion of mechanical energy into electrical energy and

more particularly to a regenerative system for charging bodies or clouds. It is desirable in many processes to be able to control the charge on a stream or body of discrete particles such as fine liquid droplets, aerosols, dust particles, etc...

Above: Perhaps the spraying of
aerosol has several uses?

 Likewise depositing similar charges on a cloud or stream of aerosols or dust particles, for example, offers the possibility of directing the flow of such particles by means of electrical attraction to a target.

It is a further object to provide a method whereby the aqueous particles of cumulus clouds may be charged rapidly with a total charge sufficient to induce lightning and a subsequent rain storm. 

In Fig. 3 there is shown a modification of the process of this invention as it may be applied to controlling the charges on particles making up clouds. Thus, cloud plumes ... are comparable to electrodes ... An extremely high-voltage would be required in order to ionize the surrounding air constituents and particles contained in the air in order to enable them to deposit their charges on the cloud particles.

Above: Cloud ionizer umbrella
at Denver International Airport

The fast negative ions produced in the air by reason of discharge by Point 25 are then drawn by plate 30 through the smoke or cloud stream as it emerges from source 23, where these ions become attached to the cloud particles. The movement of the air then carries these charged cloud ‘Particles, such as 27, out into the plume 21 away from plate 30.

The accumulation of negative charges in the top of cloud plume 21 causes point 24 to give point discharge and to produce a stream of fast-moving positive ions which become attached to the ‘cloud particles in plume 20 as they emerge in the cloud stream from source 22. The accumulation of positive charges in cloud plume 20 then becomes sufficient to maintain point discharge from point 25. When this occurs, the arrangement is self-exciting, and high voltage need no longer be applied to plate 30.

In the case of the cloud plumes of Fig.3, the fine cloud droplets or particles are so small that their movement is determined by the movement of the environmental air more than by the electric field as in the arrangement illustrated in Fig.1. Thus, the force of the air (or other gas coming from sources 22 and 23 which may be natural air currents) carries the particles with it to build up the cloud plumes 20 and 21 shown.

Above: Artificial ion generation

Such methods of controlling cloud formations may be applicable to a number of various problems. First, for example, there is the application of this method of particle charging to the creation and control of thunderstorms. When the charges in clouds 20 and 21 become great enough to create a sufficiently intense field between them, there will be lightning across the clouds and a subsequent rainstorm.

Industrial applications of this method of charging a cloud of particles include such uses as the removal of particles from a fluid stream, the atomization of liquids, and the deposition of finely divided particles on areas (ie. aircraft spraying of aerosols) ...

We realize that this patent intends to make use of ionization methods to control weather, and there has been a wealth of research done on artificial atmospheric ionization. One such article which discusses this is entitled, ARTIFICIAL ATMOSPHERIC IONIZATION: A Potential Window for Weather Modification. It can also be accessed on-line. A video regarding how electricity is being used to produce precipitation can be viewed here.

Above: Controlling weather systems. Sound familiar?

Perhaps this type of technology can help explain why we are seeing numerous thunderstorms suddenly appear near airports, such as this one (below) that was seen next to Vulcan Airport in Alberta. We are finding such anomalous storms appear to be generated or super-charged in the same specific areas over and over again. Another interesting phenomenon worth reading is rain fade, keeping in mind that, if rain affects microwave frequency, how does microwave frequency affect rain.

Above: Doppler radar for Strathmore, AB, showing a tapering storm appearing near Vulcan Airport (CFX6)

Above: Next to Vulcan Airport, AB. We know that ionizers are being used at airports, however, we are unsure what this device is used for.

Above: Location of device near Vulcan Airport, AB

There is also great article entitled, Corona ion induced atmospheric potential gradient perturbations near high voltage power lines, which discusses how high voltage power lines can be strong enough to ionize the air and affect weather conditions, as well as their adverse health effects to humans. The article can be read here. The only thing this article does not take into consideration for its studies is how electromagnetic activity emitted from transmitter antennas (telephone towers, etc), airports, and Doppler stations (ie. NEXRAD) can affect these ions. Read more about the Doppler Effect here. We provide some snippets from the article about corona ions:

The Earth’s atmosphere is slightly conducting due to the presence of small ions created by ionising radiation, such as airborne and terrestrial radioactivity and cosmic rays. Once created, an ion will attract water molecules to form a small cluster ion w 1 nm in size. Though many remain as small ions, some either recombine with a small ion of opposite polarity or attach to an aerosol altering its charge (Harrison and Carslaw, 2003). There are also anthropogenic sources of ions; for example from traffic (Israelsson and Lelwala, 1999), industrial activity (Jones and Jennings, 1977; Laurent and Peyrous, 1979) or from high voltage (HV) power lines (Chalmers, 1952; Mühleisen, 1953; Jayaratne et al., 2008). 

 [Insert: What is not mentioned above as a source of ions is the massive spraying of nano-sized metallic particles into our atmosphere during Geoengineering aerosol operations. For example, read or search U.S. Patent #5003186, Patent #3813875, Patent #3899144, Patent #4362271, Patent #4412654, Patent #4684063 ... the list goes on]

The alternating electric field near to a high voltage (HV) power cable can be strong enough to ionise the air, creating corona ions. Ions are created by the process of corona avalanching, where electrons are accelerated towards or away from the cable colliding with molecules and creating further ion electron pairs. The field is stronger when there is damage to, or protrusions (such as dirt or water droplets) on the line, so more ions are produced (Mombello et al., 2001).

Above: Take note of how the HAARP system works, as we believe there is a direct correlation with weather modification. The transmitter pictured to the far right is precisely what NEXRAD / Doppler devices are, along with numerous transmitter antennas equipped and electromagnetically-active throughout the country. HAARP is used to study the alteration of the atmosphere, and there are weather patents that link this connection. The technology of HAARP is now being used at a local level, in conjunction with our weather system technology. 

Perhaps we have an answer for these strange amounts of condensation suddenly appearing out of nowhere on our satellite images. And it provides also an answer to the tapering plume-shaped storm systems we are seeing being generated in close proximity to NEXRAD / Doppler stations around the country. The question we must answer ourselves: how is the use of this technology affecting ground water and moisture content in local areas, especially for drought-developing conditions? Should we really trust in whose hands this technology lies, artificially diverting and misplacing moisture to areas that it would otherwise not move? Should we really mess with Mother Nature, by depleting one area of moisture for another, thereby disturbing the natural water cycle and moisture patterns?

Above: Let's keep our natural ecosystems and environment natural

Above: NEXRAD-induced storms - Original image here. The latest inventions in  weather modification using electromagnetism methods listed in patents. Ask a meteorologist if it is normal to have these tapering plume-shaped cloud systems originate from near the centre of doppler / NEXRAD stations, being passed from one to another. Are these storms caused by global warming or storms caused by geoengineering? 

Above: Original image here. Although he could have done it himself, the Bethune (near Regina) Doppler station would personally like to thank Glasgow, MT and Minot, ND Doppler stations for the minor support in generating this tapered plume-shaped storm system.

Above: Original image here. North/South Dakota plume-shaped storms - NEXRAD stations connecting the dots for us.